Global
class @ Christ University
Global
class was organized in collaboration with Durham University, Canada, Christ
University (India), University of Budapest (Hungary) and a scholar from Japan. The
central theme of discussion was global economics. Opening the discussion, Dr.
Thomas, director of international relations, University of Budapest says at the
state level there are three main factor influencing decision making in global
economics.
1. US as key
global player but recognized current skeptical position of the latter.
2. Global
importers favoring China.
3. Restructuring
programs for states.
He brought
in four theoretical concepts which helps in understanding the current economic
dynamics across the world.
1. Liberalization
vs. Protectionism.
2. Technological
development driven market.
3. Internationalization
of education.
4. Change in
the meaning of geographic distance.
To the end
of his introductory talk, he opined that future of the global economics is seen
and practiced by countries across the world in various ways. One of which was
to adopt wait and see approach regarding the economic super powers. Other were, countries taking up large scale
initiatives and the trade wars between the states as the future attributes of
global economy.
Giving this
conceptualization, discussion was opened and the main aspects covered were
1. Forced liberalization
as a process which might be necessary in strengthening the European Union.
Examples such as Estonia were used to substantiate the positive use of forced liberalization
in developing the economic growth of a nation. At the same time, other examples
such as Bosnia was taken to show its negative side. Nevertheless, forced liberalization
was agreed as a positive procedure to strengthen the European Union.
2. Technology
and internationalization of education has also provided wider space for
students across the world to physically interact with many cultures and which
would help in the making of global citizen.
3. Artificial
intelligence and technology is opined to boost the economic and industrial
growth across the world.
Having
discussing all these paradigms, another major issue which was put forth by
Christ University was the expansionist policy of China. Dr. Thomas opined that
EU sees China as someone to whom they can depend to diversify their economic dependence
as their 85% of investments comes from only United States.
Even though
other universities present in the class opined that China is only worried about
business but was not eying on the political gains, Christ University voiced its
concern about Chinese economic exploitation quoting the exploitative way of
investments in Gwadar port and taking away 91% of the revenue back to China
leaving just 9% to Pakistan.
But, though
the issue of neglecting socio-economic conditions, political stability while
propagating liberalism was put forward by Christ University, discussion was not
carried forward or they were given a little focus. Even in the issue of China,
the focus was on only economics sidelining the socio-economic and
socio-cultural outcomes of the liberalization.
Comments
Post a Comment