US
Electorates and Public Sphere
Dr.
Craig L. Dicker-the
department of Public affairs US
embassy, New
Delhi visited Christ
University to speak on the US electoral process with special
reference to 2016 presidential elections. This session was held in Christ University,
Bengaluru on 2 August 2016,
by the Department of International studies and History
Dr Craig began with quoting the Indian Express’ article which
said that the
candidate who has secured the majority in the opinion polls 2 weeks after nominations would eventually win the
elections. From the article written in The Hindu “it can be seen that Mrs.
Clinton is leading 2%.” We have to wait for the November 8th
to see if this holds on.
Explaining
the electoral process, he divided the districts into democratic strong holds,
republican strong holds and flip sates. Ohio, Florida, Colorado, Pennsylvania,
Illinois, and Virginia were
considered as major flip states whose vote bank plays a major
role in deciding the president of United States. Emphasizing on 2016 elections
where there is a close competition between Mr. Trump and Mrs. Clinton, he has
opined that south districts have more republican inclination where there is
more white domination which favors the latter.
Speaking
about the electoral reforms, it was said that it is very difficult in United
States to bring in actual reforms as vested interest groups counter them by
saying that any restrictions on individuals and groups would oppose the freedom
of individual. The latter opinion was substantiated by showing the unsuccessful
“Federal election campaign amendment (1974)” and “McClain Feingold attempt” in
curbing the extensive use of money for the election campaign. Even though there
has been a cap on the spending of the Political action committees (PAC), Super
PACs take their roles with unlimited access to the spending on campaigns. While
these are not officially associated with any of the political parties or
political leaders, there can be seen an obvious understanding.
The
old trend where campaign funding is done by the capitalists has been changed
from 2004 presidential elections. The new player in the campaigning is – The
Internet. The social media has been playing a major role in the election
campaign where individuals take up the task of the latter. In 2004 there were 3
million people on the list
of
Mr. George W. Bush’s mail and in 2008 it has been increased to 13 million on
Mr. Obama’s mail. There is also increase in the online individual donations
which can be seen in this 2016 elections where one of the major contributions
for Mr. Bernie Sanders’ campaign while Barack Obama was the first to use this
online funding.
In
this presidential elections the interesting change in the mindset of young
Americans can be observed. People of age group below 30 mostly support Mr. Sanders
and the reason for this has been attributed as worry of employment and
Xenophobia. The stand of both presidential candidates is not supportive towards
the “Trans Pacific Partnership” which is due to the public pressure. He said
that may be in the coming 40 years there may come an acquitable change in the
health care system to which Obama care is a small step forward. This shows the
shift in the mindset of people which is moving away from the pure capitalism.
When it comes to foreign policy of United States, he has stated that
bureaucracy has a high influence. This can be seen in Henry Kissinger’s book
“World restore”.
When
it comes to the dilemma of Indo-US relations after the 2016 elections, he
opined that it would not change no matter who wins the elections and said that
the present Modi- Obama relationship status quo will be maintained.

Comments
Post a Comment